7. Conclusions

The testimonies from the Regina hearings have provided new, compelling evidence that underscores the significant failures and consequences of the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This revised conclusions section reflects the latest information and insights gained from these hearings.

Anyone who participated in the hearings or watched even a small fraction of the 343 recorded testimonies will have been changed forever. Many of the testimonies were heartbreaking, shocking, and often terrifying. Over the 27 days of hearings, witness testimonies provided an overall sense of how Canada has been transformed by the government’s actions to address the pandemic.

The transformation from what was once considered unthinkable—e.g., sweeping restrictions of Charter rights—to the acceptance of draconian government lockdowns within a span of just three years is indeed a remarkable and troubling phenomenon. The testimonies objectively demonstrate that an unprecedented attack has been carried out on the citizens of Canada and that not since World War II have so many Canadian lives been lost due to a single aggressive attack on its people.

It is important to appreciate that this statement is based on sworn testimony of the events and experiences described by the witnesses, and that these testimonies, as incredible as they are, do not fully capture the full breadth of the events that took place over the past four years.

The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in late 2019, presented governments worldwide with an unprecedented opportunity to change the direction of their nations. With the official excuse of containing the spread of the virus and preventing healthcare systems from being overwhelmed, many countries resorted to implementing strict lockdown measures. These measures, which included widespread business closures, travel restrictions, and stay-at-home orders, were initially introduced as temporary and emergency measures to mitigate the immediate impact of the virus.

In the early stages of the pandemic, there was a widespread sense of urgency and fear surrounding the unknown nature of the virus. Government public health experts and citizens grappled with the need to balance public safety with individual freedoms. The severity of the situation, as described in government propaganda and daily state media broadcasts, led to a general willingness among the population to accept stringent measures as a necessary evil.

During these early stages, the stated primary goal was to flatten the curve and prevent healthcare systems from collapsing under the strain of a sudden surge of COVID-19 cases. Based on the inaccurate and biased propaganda being presented to the public, the notion of lockdowns seemed logical and justifiable to curb the rapid transmission of the virus. Moreover, the need for non-pharmaceutical interventions appeared to be necessary because early effective treatments were suppressed in favour of new experimental genetic therapy vaccines.

Testimony from experts confirmed that by late March of 2020, the government already knew the true nature of COVID-19. They knew that it primarily affected the elderly with serious comorbidities and that it was not unusually deadly or virulent. However, governments persisted in their imposition of emergency measures, and as time went on, the long duration of lockdowns and their impact on daily life began to generate debate and dissent. Economies suffered severe contraction and losses, hundreds of thousands of businesses closed permanently, and livelihoods were disrupted. The societal and psychological toll of prolonged lockdowns became increasingly apparent as people grappled with issues such as mental health, educational challenges, and social isolation.

Governments undertook unprecedented levels of spending, and the impacts of all of this debt will affect generations of Canadians to come. Thousands of people lost their lives due to fear, loneliness, depression, the postponement or lack of medical care, or from adverse reactions to an experimental biologic injection. People were so terrified by the government propaganda that they turned on each other; friends, families, and communities were torn apart. The government dehumanized large identifiable groups and, in so doing, encouraged a toxic and dangerous environment. As a result, the incidence of suicide, violence, and despair increased to unprecedented levels.

As the pandemic persisted, there were differences in the approach to lockdowns among various countries. Some nations adopted more targeted and localized measures, while others implemented broad and strict nationwide lockdowns. These varying approaches contributed to a diverse range of experiences and public perceptions. Citizens began to undertake their own research and come together. They realized that standard practices which had stood the test of time had been discarded and replaced by ill-thought-out, ridiculous, and ineffective mandates. Although governments had done extensive emergency planning well in advance of 2020, these emergency plans were simply discarded, and those professionals who were trained to implement emergency measures were sidelined.

In summary, the normalization of once-unthinkable draconian government lockdowns within a relatively short period can be attributed to a focused campaign of propaganda and false information produced by government—and their partners in media and big business—to promote COVID-19 as a terrifying pandemic. They used this excuse of combating a novel virus, combined with fears of overwhelming the healthcare systems, to persuade the public to accept these measures. However, as time progressed, the long-term consequences and societal costs associated with prolonged lockdowns could no longer be hidden from the public.

New Revelations from Regina Hearings

The recent Regina hearings have unveiled additional disturbing facts that further question the legitimacy and ethics of government actions during the pandemic:

1. Shocking Vaccine Recommendations: Despite overwhelming evidence of adverse reactions and the questionable efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, the Canadian government continues to recommend these vaccines to children as young as six-months-old. This recommendation persists despite testimony about the severe health consequences experienced by many individuals post-vaccination. This despite children being at virtually no risk of dying from COVID-19.

2. Shedding and Secondary Exposure: New information about the phenomenon of viral shedding has come to light, indicating that vaccinated individuals may transmit vaccine-derived viral particles to the unvaccinated, potentially causing health issues. This raises serious concerns about the safety and long-term effects of the vaccines.

3. Lack of Democratic Process: Witnesses like Hon. Nadine Wilson highlighted the alarming absence of any democratic process in the decision-making related to pandemic measures. Decisions were made by a small group of officials without legislative debate, sidelining elected representatives and emergency measures personnel. This concentration of power and exclusion of democratic oversight is a grave concern for the future of governance in Canada.

4. Government Overreach and Totalitarian Measures: The swift implementation of authoritarian measures, such as forced vaccination and the closure of businesses and places of worship, has shown how quickly democratic norms can be eroded under the guise of emergency response. This situation is a stark reminder of the risks posed to democracy when power is centralized and unchecked.

5. Ignoring Calls for a Judicial Inquiry: The ongoing refusal to establish a judicial inquiry into the government’s handling of the pandemic highlights a troubling lack of accountability. A thorough, independent investigation is crucial to understanding the full scope of the decisions made and their impacts on Canadian society. A judicial inquiry should also be tasked with identifying criminal wrong-doing and crimes against humanity and bringing the responsible parties to the criminal justice system, regardless of any position of perceived privilege.

6. Lack of Appropriate Compensation for Vaccine-Injured: Many individuals who suffered adverse reactions to the vaccines have not received appropriate compensation or support. The government’s failure to address these harms adequately has left many struggling with long-term health and financial issues.

7. Continuation of Mandates in Certain Institutions: Despite the lifting of many public health measures, some universities and healthcare institutions continue to enforce vaccination mandates. This ongoing coercion raises concerns about personal freedom and Informed Consent.

8. Lack of Independent Research on Vaccine Side Effects: There remains a significant gap in independent research on both the short-term and long-term side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. This lack of data hampers the ability to make fully informed public health decisions and undermines trust in the vaccination program.

9. Apology and Accountability: The Canadian government must issue a formal apology to the people of Canada for the unprecedented harms inflicted during the pandemic. Additionally, those responsible for implementing these harmful measures must be held accountable to restore public trust and ensure such overreach is never repeated.

These incredible claims and findings, once unthinkable, now demand accountability and thorough investigation. The validity of these assertions is undeniable upon reviewing the extensive testimonies and evidence presented. The Canadian government’s actions during the pandemic have not only impacted public health but also the very foundations of democracy and civil rights in the country. Accountability for these alleged crimes must be rendered.