top of page
Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

🔍 How to Use the Archive Search

 

Use the search bar below to explore the National Citizens Archive. This is a powerful tool designed to help you quickly locate specific information across reports, transcripts, videos, and exhibits.

​

Tips for Best Results:

  • Search by keywords or phrases
    Enter a single word (e.g., vaccine, mandates, Charter) or a phrase (e.g., informed consent, adverse events).

  • Use specific terms
    The more precise your search, the more relevant your results will be. Try names, topics, or key terms from testimony.

  • Try different variations
    If you don’t find what you’re looking for, try synonyms or alternate wording.

  • Results include multiple content types
    Your search may return matches from reports, witness transcripts, video pages, and other archive materials.

  • Results are ranked by relevance
    The most relevant matches will appear first.

 

⏳ Please Be Patient

This archive contains a very large volume of content, including thousands of pages of testimony and documentation.

  • Initial results may take a few moments to load

  • If results appear incomplete, allow additional time for the search to fully populate

  • You can refine your search at any time to narrow results

 

💡 Helpful Tip

 

Once you open a document (such as a transcript or report), you can use your browser’s Find function (Ctrl+F or Cmd+F) to quickly locate specific words within that page.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png
Not sureWhat To Search For Button_edited.png

837 results found with an empty search

  • Allen | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 May 4, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • NCI-R-03-Item-5-0-1 | National Citizens Ar

    5. Analysis 5. Analysis Introduction Following is the analysis, commentary, and recommendations as put forward by the Commissioners. To facilitate the analysis and review, the information has been divided into various broad areas as follows: CIVIL Legal, policing, policy, regulatory, human rights, emergency preparedness, government, private–public partnerships, anti-trust, monopolies, private corporations; SOCIAL Media, family, faith, education, community, service delivery, societal coercion; ECONOMIC Impacts related to financial matters at all levels—personal, family, corporate—and governmental expenditures and debt, government actions; and HEALTH Medicine, research, pharmaceuticals, regulating and safety monitoring, patient relations, doctor–patient relationship, industry health, messaging, incentives, regulatory collusion. Each of the categories listed above cannot be fully appreciated independently of each other. Each category is only a part of the much larger whole of the information presented, and specific subject areas cross categories. This reflects the intersectionality of all areas that were considered. Report Content Reader Page 📄 Note to Readers The content presented on this page has been adapted for online viewing and navigation. Due to formatting limitations within the web display system, certain elements—such as layout, spacing, and visual structure—may differ slightly from the original report. For the complete and fully formatted version, we encourage you to download the official PDF available on the Report Information page. The PDF reflects the report exactly as it was originally written and published.

  • NCI-R-02-Item-7-3-3 | National Citizens Ar

    7.3.3 Financial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response on Canada 7.3.3 Financial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response on Canada Introduction The actions of the various levels of government, private organizations, and individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruption to the economy of Canada. The announcement of the pandemic and subsequent implementation of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical measures resulted in significant economic damage, ranging from widespread job losses to business closures and government debt accumulation. This section explores the financial impact of the pandemic on Canada, delving into its effects on various sectors of the economy and the measures taken. According to testimony from Dr. Jordan Peterson, a new disease was detected, which was not well understood, and the authorities panicked and used that panic to impose tyranny. In order to avoid responsibility for their actions, they abdicated their political responsibility to hypothetical experts in public health. Both political leaders and citizens allowed these non-elected officials to use terror to justify implementation of restrictions. These same officials then unleashed unbridled spending on measures that were actually caused by the restrictions imposed by them. The actions of the government caused “untold economic damage“ to all sectors of our economy. The best way to try to evaluate the damage discussed by Dr. Peterson is to review the data provided by the Treasury Board of Canada to understand the magnitude of spending that was carried out. Witness David Leis stated that the costs of the mandates were profoundly damaging in all aspects of our society including economics. He further stated that governments did not follow their emergency plans to mitigate these effects. Evaluation of the totality of the economic effects are well beyond the scope of this report; however, the testimony received did point to a number of specific areas of economic impact and further suggested other significant sources of economic impact which are not yet understood. Economic Contraction and Unemployment The pandemic measures led to a sharp contraction of the Canadian economy as restrictions on movement and business operations severely disrupted various sectors. Industries such as hospitality, tourism, retail, and entertainment were hit hardest, resulting in widespread layoffs and business closures. According to Statistics Canada, the country experienced its steepest economic decline on record in the second quarter of 2020, with a contraction of 11.5 per cent. The increase in unemployment rates was one of the most significant financial consequences of the pandemic. Many individuals lost their jobs or faced reduced hours, causing financial instability and impacting their ability to meet basic needs. The unemployment rate surged from 5.6 per cent in February 2020 to a peak of 13.7 per cent in May 2020, representing millions of Canadians affected by the economic fallout. As noted previously, significant taxpayer funds were expended to provide economic support to workers who were forced into an unemployed situation due to the government-imposed mandates. At the same time, many workers who lost their employment for refusing the mandated injection were refused employment benefits. Government Spending and Debt Accumulation As a response to the government‘s own actions in implementing the mandates and various other unnecessary and ineffective measures, the Canadian government implemented significant fiscal measures. These measures included direct support to individuals and businesses, wage subsidies, and increased healthcare spending. The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) provided temporary income support to those who lost their jobs or income due to the pandemic. The Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) aimed to help businesses retain employees. According to the Treasury Board of Canada , the federal government‘s expenditures related to COVID-19 included the following: 2020–2021: $134.9 billion 2021–2022: $ 40.1 billion 2022–2023: $ 6.0 billion (to February 2023 only) Total: $181.0 billion To illustrate where this money was spent, a breakdown of the COVID–19 expenditures for 2020–2021 are provided by the Treasury Board as follows: Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) $65.23 B Safe Restart Agreement $15.88 B Canada Recovery Benefits $14.47 B Further Support for Medical Research and Vaccine Developments $ 3.18 B Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) $ 2.95 B Essential Workers Wage Top–up $ 2.88 B One-Time Payment for Seniors Eligible for Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) $ 2.46 B Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance (CECRA) for Small Businesses $ 2.15 B Safe Return to Class $ 2.00 B Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit $ 1.97 B Regional Relief and Recovery Fund $ 1.87 B Funding for Personal Protective Equipment and Supplies $ 1.80 B Cleaning Up Former Oil and Gas Wells $ 1.72 B Supporting Provincial and Territorial Job Training Efforts as Part of COVID-19 Economic Recovery $ 1.50 B Enhancing Student Financial Assistance for Fall 2020 $ 1.35 B Supporting Indigenous Communities in the Fight Against COVID-19 $ 1.03 B Expanding Existing Federal Employment, Skills Development, Student and Youth Programming $ 879.99 M Rapid Housing Initiative $ 870.44 M Support for Persons with Disabilities $ 810.30 M Support for International Partners $ 698.77 M Safe Restart Agreement Federal Investments in Testing, Contact Tracing, and Data Management $ 533.26 M Support for Cultural, Heritage, and Sport Organizations $ 497.87 M Support for Canada‘s Academic Research Community $ 434.46 M COVID-19 Response Fund $ 430.46 M Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit $ 419.84 M Support for the Homeless (through Reaching Home) $ 394.08 M Indigenous Public Health Investments $ 387.43 M Emergency Community Support Fund $ 349.70 M Support for Workers in the Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Energy Sector $ 320.00 M Supporting a Safe Restart in Indigenous Communities $ 314.77 M Canada Emergency Response Benefit Administration Costs $ 309.38 M Canadian Armed Forces Support for the COVID-19 Response $ 292.37 M Enhancing Public Health Measures in Indigenous Communities $ 278.98 M Support for the On-Reserve Income Assistance Program $ 262.18 M PPE and Related Equipment Support for Essential Workers $ 254.22 M Canada Revenue Agency Funding for COVID-19 Economic Measures $ 242.90 M Support for COVID-19 Medical Research and Vaccine Developments $ 239.29 M Support for Indigenous Businesses and Aboriginal Financial Institutions $ 228.80 M Quarantine Facilities and COVID-19 Border Measures $ 228.50 M Health and Social Support for Northern Communities $ 179.60 M Support for Food Banks and Local Food Organizations $ 170.94 M Supporting Canada‘s Farmers, Food Businesses, and Food Supply $ 157.52 M Supporting Public Health Measures in Correctional Institutions $ 155.79 M Support for Fish Harvesters $ 144.82 M Virtual Care and Mental Health Support $ 137.32 M Support for Local Indigenous Businesses and Economies $ 133.00 M Supporting and Sustaining the Public Health Agency of Canada and Health Canada‘s Pandemic Operations $ 132.53 M Targeted Extension of the Innovation Assistance Program $ 127.29 M Ensuring Access to Canada Revenue Agency Call Centres $ 127.24 M Support for the Canadian Red Cross $ 99.34 M Funding for VIA Rail Canada Inc. $ 90.43 M Support for Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada $ 83.74 M Indigenous Mental Wellness Support $ 82.43 M Support for Food System Firms that Hire Temporary Foreign Workers $ 74.04 M Support Essential Air Access to Remote Communities $ 68.58 M Parks Canada Revenue Replacement and Rent Relief $ 57.29 M Consular Assistance for Canadians Abroad $ 56.50 M Addressing the Outbreak of COVID-19 among Temporary Foreign Workers on Farms $ 50.61 M Support for Women‘s Shelters and Sexual Assault Centres, including in Indigenous Communities $ 49.96 M Addressing Gender-Based Violence during COVID-19 $ 48.86 M Support for Fish and Seafood Processors $ 45.19 M Bio-Manufacturing Capacity Expansion—National Research Council Royalmount Facility $ 43.47 M COVID-19 Communications and Marketing $ 43.07 M Supporting Distress Centres, the Wellness Together Canada Portal $ 41.72 M Emissions Reduction Fund for the Oil and Gas Sector $ 31.71 M Support for the Broadcasting Industry $ 31.59 M Support for Safe Operation in the Forest Sector $ 30.08 M Support for Canada‘s National Museums $ 25.70 M Support for Veterans‘ Organizations $ 20.00 M New Horizons for Seniors Program Expansion $ 19.97 M Support for Food Inspection Services $ 19.40 M Support for Canada‘s National Arts Centre $ 18.20 M Supporting the Ongoing Delivery of Key Benefits $ 17.80 M Canada Emergency Student Benefit—Administration Costs $ 17.62 M Financial Relief for First Nations through the First Nations Finance Authority $ 17.10 M Women Entrepreneurship Strategy—Ecosystem Top-up $ 15.03 M Personal Support Worker Training and Other Measures to Address Labour Shortages in Long-Term and Home Care $ 12.73 M Immediate Public Health Response $ 12.50 M Granville Island Emergency Relief Fund $ 10.44 M Advertising Campaign: Government of Canada‘s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan $ 10.00 M Support for Main Street Businesses $ 7.82 M Support for the Federal Bridge Corporation Limited $ 5.76 M Support for the National Film Board $ 4.74 M Investments in Long-Term Care and other Supportive Care Facilities $ 4.65 M Support for Children and Youth $ 4.20 M Canadian Digital Service $ 3.59 M Labour Market Impact Assessment Refund $ 2.78 M Canada Student Loan Moratorium $ 2.49 M Support for the National Capital Commission $ 1.94 M Innovative Research and Support for New Testing Approaches and Technologies for COVID-19 $ 1.41 M Regional Air Transportation Initiative $ 1.10 M Support for the Audiovisual Industry $ 795.07 K Supporting Court Operations and Access to Justice $ 70.16 K Total $134.85 B Detailed breakdowns of the expenditures for years 2022 through 2023 are available from the Treasury Board of Canada. These controversial initiatives led to a substantial increase in government spending and a surge in the national debt. The federal budget deficit for the 2020–2021 fiscal year reached a historic high of over $354 billion. As a result, Canada‘s total federal debt surpassed the $1 trillion mark, which will have long-term implications for the country‘s fiscal health and future economic policies. Canada‘s Department of Finance reported the following values for the National Debt of Canada: March 31, 2019 : Canada reported a federal national debt of $685.5 billion dollars. March 31, 2020 : Canada reported a federal national debt of $721.4 billion dollars. March 31, 2021 : Canada reported a federal national debt of $1.0487 trillion dollars. March 31, 2022 : Canada reported a federal national debt of $1.1345 trillion dollars. It must be clearly understood that it is Canadian citizens who are responsible for this debt and that the size of this new debt will have significant impacts on Canadians for generations to come. Witness Edward Dowd testified concerning the costs related to excess deaths in the United States, and although these deaths are not directly related to the Canadian experience, certain indications can be gleaned from the statistical cost estimates related to excess deaths reported in the 2021 to 2022 period. According to Mr. Dowd, in the United States over the period of 2021 to 2022, there were an estimated 300,000 excess deaths that he attributed to vaccine deaths and deaths due to mandates imposed. The estimated economic cost of these deaths is estimated to be on the order of $150 billion. Witness Dr. Denis Rancourt‘s estimate of these costs for Canada is approximately 10 per cent of these figures, which would equate to around $15 billion in loss. These estimates do not include the additional losses due to lost productivity. Dr. Douglas Allen testified that the modelling of deaths utilized by the government to justify their actions was based on false assumptions, and the estimated number of deaths was grossly incorrect. The estimated number of deaths predicted by the government model was approximately 15 times what actually happened. Additional costs that were not taken into account include lost education opportunities, increased deaths and reduced life expectancy due to increased unemployment, increased deaths due to despair, increased domestic violence and family breakdown, supply chain disruption costs and consequences, and direct deaths caused by lockdowns and vaccines. Dr. Allen stated: Lockdowns are not just an inefficient policy, they must rank as one of the greatest peacetime policy disasters of all time. Stock Market Volatility and Investment Implications The stock market experienced significant volatility during the pandemic, with widespread fluctuations in values across various sectors. While some companies thrived due to increased demand for certain products and services (for example, technology and e-commerce), others faced steep declines. Investors faced heightened uncertainty and risk, impacting retirement savings, investment portfolios, and overall financial stability. The pandemic‘s financial impact also highlighted the need for diversification and resilience in investment strategies. It underscored the importance of considering factors such as industry resilience, sustainability, and adaptability when making investment decisions. The volatile market conditions prompted many individuals to reassess their financial goals and seek professional advice to navigate the uncertainty. Some investors removed their capital from the market altogether fearing account lockouts or wholesale market devaluation. Dr. Douglas Allen testified that there was an $80 billion drop in the stock market in Canada between March and April 2020 as a result of the government‘s actions. Conclusion The government response to the COVID-19 pandemic had far-reaching financial consequences for Canada, impacting various sectors of the economy and affecting the lives of individuals and businesses across the country. The economic contraction, increased unemployment, government spending, and growing debt levels created significant challenges. Small businesses have struggled to survive, and investors have faced heightened volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets. Addressing these financial impacts requires a multifaceted approach that involves continued government support, fiscal prudence, and a focus on economic recovery and resilience. Balancing public health measures with targeted support for affected industries and individuals is crucial for mitigating the long-term effects of the pandemic on Canada‘s financial wellbeing. By learning from this crisis and implementing strategic policies, Canada can emerge stronger and more resilient in the post-pandemic era. Recommendations Restraints must be placed on public health officers . They must be required to immediately justify their recommendations with legitimate cost–benefit analyses, and their decisions must be subject to the authority of publicly elected officials and the transparent scrutiny of the public. All scientific studies on either side of a crisis must be made available to the public so that the effect of propaganda can be minimized. Public health officials should never be placed in charge of an Emergency Response. Emergency Response must remain the purview of professionals trained in medical and emergency procedures who understand how to set goals and achieve them. Lockdowns and mandates must require direct legislative authority. These steps cannot be allowed to be carried out under regulations. The media must be held to account for their collusion in the propaganda that caused the panic among citizens and authorities. A detailed financial audit must be undertaken on each and every dollar that was spent on the pandemic. It must be determined whether any mishandling of these funds occurred. Identify and prioritize essential expenditures directly related to public health and safety, such as healthcare infrastructure and support for vulnerable populations. Evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of existing programs and initiatives to ensure resources are allocated wisely, redirecting funds from less effective areas to more impactful measures. Focus financial support on the most affected sectors and individuals, such as small businesses, low-income households, and those facing unemployment or reduced income due to the mandates. Streamline administrative processes to reduce red tape, bureaucratic delays, and associated costs, ensuring funds are disbursed promptly to those in need. Enhance transparency and accountability in spending by providing regular public reporting on the allocation and utilization of funds, enabling citizens to monitor government expenditures. Invest in long-term emergency planning and preparedness measures to mitigate the impact of future pandemics or health emergencies. This may include strengthening public health infrastructure, establishing emergency funds, and enhancing the capacity for rapid response and data collection. Ensure that future public health emergencies are operated by the existing Emergency Management Apparatus and that the public health authorities provide input into that apparatus but are not able to lead or control it. Response to future public emergencies must be driven by and directed by local emergency planning personnel on the ground and not driven by federal government political processes. Consider the potential cost-saving benefits of investing in preventive healthcare measures, public health education, and research and development in the healthcare sector. Continuously monitor the effectiveness and impact of government spending on COVID-19 mandates and measures, adjusting allocations as needed based on evolving circumstances, scientific evidence, and changing priorities. Engage in rigorous and public evaluation and assessment of programs and policies to identify areas of inefficiency or ineffectiveness, making data-driven decisions to optimize resource utilization. Focus on measures that stimulate economic recovery and job creation, such as infrastructure investments, targeted incentives for business growth and innovation, and initiatives to promote consumer spending and tourism. Balance short-term relief measures with long-term economic strategies to foster sustainable growth and resilience in the post-pandemic era. Canada must adopt a Canada First policy where our national interest drives overall policy agendas. This applies to all aspects of our nation, including fiscal, financial, social and environmental policy. Global planning and response with a lack of Canadian input created the situation that we now find ourselves in. Canada is a country whose economy is dependant on natural resource extraction and production. Canada must implement policies to upgrade and expand these core economic drivers so that export income can be quickly injected into the Canadian economy, addressing these historic debts caused by the government‘s actions during the pandemic. Some of the damage and hardships experienced by Canadians was caused by an acute lack of independence and diversity of critical aspects of our economy. Canada must rigorously review and apply the anti-combines laws (Competition Act ) to limit Canadians exposure to undue influence from the many monopolies that currently exist across critical sectors of our economy. By implementing these recommendations, governments can exercise restraint in spending while ensuring that essential needs are addressed, support is provided to those most affected, and long-term preparedness measures are in place. It is crucial to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and the necessary investments to protect public health, support the economy, and promote the overall wellbeing of citizens. Report Content Reader Page 📄 Note to Readers The content presented on this page has been adapted for online viewing and navigation. Due to formatting limitations within the web display system, certain elements—such as layout, spacing, and visual structure—may differ slightly from the original report. For the complete and fully formatted version, we encourage you to download the official PDF available on the Report Information page. The PDF reflects the report exactly as it was originally written and published.

  • Rocchio | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 May 2, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • NCI-R-03-Item-5-1-1 | National Citizens Ar

    5.1.1 Performance of Canada’s Police Services During the Pandemic 5.1.1 Performance of Canada’s Police Services During the Pandemic Introduction The reader is advised to review section 7.1.10 Policing During COVID-19 Pandemic: Balancing Authority and Citizens‘ Rights, contained in the original NCI Report of November 28, 2023. The performance of Canada’s police services during the COVID-19 pandemic raises significant concerns regarding their independence and ability to uphold the rule of law. Despite overwhelming evidence of alleged fraud, loss of life, and violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms , no police service in Canada is known to be actively investigating or laying charges against any government officials or other entities involved in the implementation of pandemic mandates. This lack of action persists despite substantial evidence being presented to various police services across the country. Lack of Investigations and Accountability Throughout the pandemic, numerous allegations have emerged that suggest certain government actions and mandates may have violated laws and infringed upon the rights of Canadians. Reports of fraud, unnecessary loss of life due to enforced policies, and systemic rights violations have been meticulously documented and presented to law enforcement agencies. However, to date, there has been no significant response from Canada’s police services. No charges have been laid, and no investigations appear to be actively pursued. This silence is troubling for several reasons. Firstly, it suggests a potential politicization of law enforcement agencies, where police services may be influenced or controlled by political agendas rather than acting independently to uphold the law. Secondly, it undermines public trust in law enforcement, as the police are perceived as failing to protect citizens’ rights and failing to hold accountable those who may have acted unlawfully during the pandemic. Witness Testimony Testimony of Donald Best Donald Best is a retired Toronto Police Detective with extensive experience in major crime investigations and anti-corruption operations. He has been a vocal advocate for transparency and accountability within police services and government institutions. His career in law enforcement spans several decades, during which he has earned a reputation for integrity and thoroughness in his investigative work. Testimony Concerning Ottawa Police Constable Helen Grus During the NCI hearings in Regina on June 1, 2024, Donald Best provided compelling testimony regarding the case of Ottawa Police Constable Helen Grus. Constable Grus had been investigating the potential link between COVID-19 vaccinations and sudden infant deaths. Her investigation was met with significant resistance from within the Ottawa Police Service (OPS). Best detailed how Grus’s inquiries were abruptly halted, and she faced internal disciplinary actions. The message sent by the OPS was clear: questioning the official narrative of the pandemic and the safety of COVID-19 vaccinations would not be tolerated. This stance by the OPS serves as a warning to police services across Canada, discouraging officers from independently investigating or questioning pandemic-related policies and decisions. Government and Institutional Resistance Donald Best’s testimony highlighted a broader issue of institutional resistance to scrutiny and transparency during the pandemic. The actions taken against Constable Grus are symptomatic of a larger effort to suppress dissent and prevent critical examination of the government’s handling of the COVID-19 response. This has serious implications for the integrity of law enforcement and the ability of officers to carry out their duties without fear of reprisal. Revisions to the Ontario Policing Act In his testimony, Best also discussed recent revisions to the Ontario Police Services Act . These revisions now require detectives to obtain approval from their supervisors before undertaking an investigation. Historically, detectives had the autonomy to initiate investigations based on their professional judgment and the evidence at hand. Best speculated that this change is designed to further control the narrative and limit independent investigations that might contradict the government’s stance on pandemic measures. By requiring supervisory approval, the government ensures that only investigations aligning with the official narrative are pursued. This bureaucratic oversight undermines the independence of detectives and stifles genuine investigative work that is crucial for accountability and justice. Implications for Police Services Across Canada The implications of these developments are profound. They signal to police services across the country that there is little tolerance for questioning or investigating the government’s pandemic response. This creates an environment where officers may feel pressured to conform rather than seek the truth, which ultimately erodes public trust in law enforcement. Donald Best’s testimony underscores the importance of maintaining independence and integrity within police services. It highlights the need for transparency and accountability, particularly in times of crisis. The actions taken against Constable Grus and the revisions to the Ontario Police Services Act represent a significant threat to these principles and warrant serious concern and scrutiny from the public and policymakers alike. The Role of Police Services Police services in Canada are intended to operate independently of the political class. Their primary role is to enforce the law impartially, without influence from political entities. This independence is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the justice system and ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their position, are subject to the same legal standards. The apparent reluctance or refusal of police services to investigate potential wrongdoings related to the COVID-19 pandemic raises questions about their autonomy. Historically, police officers have had the authority and responsibility to investigate allegations of misconduct and to pursue justice based on the evidence. The current situation, however, reflects a departure from this principle, as political considerations seem to override the mandate of impartial law enforcement. Troubling Implications The silence and inaction of Canada’s police services during this critical period have several troubling implications: Erosion of Public Trust : The public’s confidence in law enforcement is eroded when police services fail to act on credible evidence of wrongdoing. This lack of action suggests that the police may not be a reliable safeguard against abuses of power. Perception of Bias : The perceived alignment of police services with political agendas creates a sense of bias and partiality. This undermines the fundamental principle of equal justice under the law and raises concerns about selective enforcement. Accountability Deficit : Without thorough investigations and accountability, those responsible for potential violations during the pandemic may never be held to account. This lack of accountability sets a dangerous precedent and may encourage future disregard for legal and ethical standards. Compromised Independence : The apparent influence of political considerations on police services compromises their independence. An independent police force is essential for a functioning democracy, ensuring that laws are applied fairly and consistently. Conclusion The performance of Canada’s police services during the COVID-19 pandemic reveals a troubling trend of inaction and potential politicization. Despite substantial evidence of possible illegal activities and rights violations, no significant investigations or charges have been initiated against those responsible for implementing pandemic mandates. This inaction undermines public trust, erodes the principle of equal justice, and compromises the independence of law enforcement. It is imperative that police services in Canada reaffirm their commitment to impartiality and independence. By conducting thorough and unbiased investigations into allegations of wrongdoing, they can restore public confidence and uphold the rule of law. The silence of law enforcement during this critical time must be addressed to ensure that justice is served and that such oversights do not recur in the future. Recommendations Based on the witness testimony and the preceding discussion regarding Canada‘s justice system and its actions during the pandemic, the following are recommendations for improvements: Separate the Roles of Canada’s Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Rationale : Currently, Canada allows the same individual to perform both the roles of the Minister of Justice and of the Attorney General. The Minister of Justice is a political assignment, responsible for policy-making and political decision-making within the realm of justice. In contrast, the Attorney General serves as the country’s chief law enforcement officer, responsible for upholding the law impartially and without political influence. Combining these roles can lead to conflicts of interest and compromises the independence of the justice system. Recommendation : The roles of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General must be separated and assigned to two different individuals. The Attorney General should be appointed on a non-political basis, selected purely on merit, professional qualifications, and experience in the legal field. This separation is required so that the administration of justice is carried out impartially and free from political influence, thereby enhancing the integrity and independence of Canada’s legal and justice system. 2. Establish Independent Oversight Bodies Create independent civilian oversight bodies at both provincial and federal levels to monitor police actions and hold them accountable. These bodies should have the authority to investigate police conduct and impose sanctions where necessary. 3. Strengthen Whistleblower Protections Implement robust protections for whistleblowers within police services to ensure that officers can report misconduct or undue political influence without fear of retaliation. 4. Mandate Transparency in Investigations Require police services to publicly disclose the status and outcomes of investigations into potential wrongdoing, particularly those related to government actions and public health mandates. 5. Enhance Training on Ethical Standards Provide comprehensive training for all police officers on ethical standards, the importance of impartiality, and the critical role of independence in law enforcement. 6. Implement Regular Audits and Reviews Conduct regular audits and reviews of police activities by independent bodies for compliance with legal standards and to identify any undue influence or misconduct. 7. Facilitate Public Access to Information Ensure that the public has access to information regarding police investigations and actions. This could include creating publicly accessible databases of complaints and their resolutions. 8. Strengthen Legal Frameworks for Police Independence Revise and strengthen legal frameworks to clearly delineate the independence of police services from political entities. This should include clear consequences for breaches of this independence. 9. Create Mechanisms for Public Input Establish mechanisms for regular public input and feedback on policing practices and policies. This could involve town hall meetings, public forums, and online platforms for citizens to voice concerns and suggestions. 10. Ensure Accountability for Inaction Develop clear policies and procedures to hold police services accountable for inaction, especially in cases involving significant public interest or potential rights violations. This should include disciplinary measures for officers and officials who fail to act on credible evidence. 11. Increase Funding for Independent Investigations Allocate dedicated funding for independent investigations into police misconduct and politically motivated actions to ensure that these investigations are thorough and unbiased. 12. Mandatory Reporting of Political Interference Introduce mandatory reporting requirements for any instances of political interference in police investigations, with strict penalties for non-compliance. 13. Public Education Campaigns Launch public education campaigns to inform citizens about their rights, the role of police, and the importance of police independence. This can empower the public to demand accountability and transparency. 14. Review and Reform Use of Force Policies Conduct a comprehensive review of use of force policies so that they remain aligned with best practices and human rights standards, and implement reforms as necessary. By implementing these recommendations, Canada can address the systemic issues within its policing services, ensuring that they operate with the independence, transparency, and accountability required to uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of all citizens. Report Content Reader Page 📄 Note to Readers The content presented on this page has been adapted for online viewing and navigation. Due to formatting limitations within the web display system, certain elements—such as layout, spacing, and visual structure—may differ slightly from the original report. For the complete and fully formatted version, we encourage you to download the official PDF available on the Report Information page. The PDF reflects the report exactly as it was originally written and published.

  • Ness | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 April 22, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • Bourgault | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 April 20, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • Allard | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 April 14, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • Corbett | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 May 18, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • Peterson | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 March 18, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • MacIver | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 April 13, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

  • Chin | National Citizens Ar

    Detailed Commissioner Report Info Referenced in the Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Report ID: Publication Date No. Of Pages: NCI-R-04 April 30, 2024 1267 April 27, 2023 Report National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) Investigation: Are Children Safe in Canada April 30, 2025 Main Topic Purpose and Need for the NCI The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was established in response to growing public concerns over the Canadian government’s handling of the COVID-19 event. As the COVID-19 emergency measures unfolded, questions arose regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of the measures implemented, including lockdowns, mandates, and the deployment of COVID-19 “vaccines.” These concerns fuelled the need for a thorough examination of the impact these policies had on health, the economy, on society and civil liberties. The NCI, conceived as an independent and citizen led initiative, sought to comprehensively investigate these issues. Its primary purpose was to provide a platform for individuals and experts to share their experiences, insights, and evidence, in order to uncover the truth, hold authorities accountable, and improve future public health responses. On November 28, 2023, the NCI Commissioners released their comprehensive final report, titled Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada . A year later, on November 28, 2024, a supplemental report was issued as part of the NCI’s ongoing efforts to address new and emerging concerns related to the COVID-19 investigation. Having completed its original mandate of investigating the appropriateness and efficacy of the COVID-19 measures, the NCI expanded its focus. After consulting with a broad range of Canadians, the NCI recognized a significant public concern regarding the current state of children's safety in Canada. Consequently, the NCI undertook a new investigation specifically aimed at evaluating and safeguarding the well-being of children across the country. One Line Summary Heading 2 Synopsis Heading 2

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Disclaimer: The National Citizens Archive is an independent archival and research initiative created to preserve, organize, and make accessible historical materials, testimony, transcripts, reports, and related public records arising from the National Citizens Inquiry process. The National Citizens Archive is not the official website of the federally incorporated National Citizens Inquiry organization, and no formal legal, corporate, or governance relationship should be inferred unless and until such a relationship is expressly agreed to in writing by the relevant parties.

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page