top of page
Divider Lines_edited.png

Witness Testimony

Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
1 Dr. Chris Milburn TN.png
Watch the Testimony Button_edited.jpg
Read The Transcript Button_edited.png
Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Keywords from Transcript

Canadian Armed Forces, vaccine mandate, Chief of Defence Staff, Directive 1-3, National Defence Act section 126, religious accommodation denial, medical accommodation denial, 5F release category, grievance system delays, whistleblower protections, Inspector General proposal, vaccine injury reporting suppression, chain-of-command authority, morale collapse, Veterans Affairs denial

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Included in the Report:

Report 2.png
Download the Report Button_edited_edited_edited.png

Ms. Catherine Christensen

Lawyer

Expert

Witness ID:

NCI-W-159

Hearing

Red Deer

Alberta

Date:

April 26, 2023

Report

Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Main Topic

Legal analysis of Canadian Armed Forces COVID-19 vaccine mandate, chain-of-command authority, accommodation processes, and institutional impact.

One Line Summary

Military lawyer testifies on CAF vaccine mandates, alleged coercion and accommodation failures, and institutional consequences for service members.

Synopsis

Catherine Christensen, a lawyer representing Canadian Armed Forces members and founder of the Valour Legal Action Centre, testified regarding the implementation and consequences of the CAF COVID-19 vaccine mandate introduced in October 2021. She stated that she represents approximately 360 serving members and veterans and has communicated with thousands more. She described the mandate as being implemented through a series of directives rather than under section 126 of the National Defence Act, which would have required court martial proceedings to determine reasonable refusal. She asserted that this approach avoided independent judicial review and resulted in inconsistent enforcement across the chain-of-command.
Ms. Christensen testified that religious and medical accommodations were largely denied despite sworn affidavits and chaplain support in some cases. She described remedial measures, 5F release classifications, and administrative actions that she characterized as punitive and stigmatizing. She alleged that some military medical personnel were discouraged from formally reporting vaccine injuries and that official injury statistics underreported adverse events. She further stated that grievances filed by members ultimately return to the Chief of Defence Staff as final authority, limiting perceived impartial review.
She estimated that between 3,000 and 5,000 personnel were lost through resignation, release, or other administrative outcomes following the mandate, which she argued significantly weakened operational readiness and morale. She described a breakdown of trust within the chain-of-command and characterized the mandate as having long-term institutional consequences. Among proposed reforms, she recommended creation of an independent Inspector General outside the chain-of-command, strengthened whistleblower protections, comprehensive health coverage for injured members, mandatory injury tracking, and legislative review of section 126 of the National Defence Act.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

 

🔎  How to Search the Transcript

 

Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.

​

Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:

​

  • Windows: Press Ctrl + F

  • Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F

 

A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.

​

This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.

Divider Lines_edited.png

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Disclaimer: The National Citizens Archive is an independent archival and research initiative created to preserve, organize, and make accessible historical materials, testimony, transcripts, reports, and related public records arising from the National Citizens Inquiry process. The National Citizens Archive is not the official website of the federally incorporated National Citizens Inquiry organization, and no formal legal, corporate, or governance relationship should be inferred unless and until such a relationship is expressly agreed to in writing by the relevant parties.

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page