
Witness Testimony
Keywords from Transcript
Law Society suspension, Reopening Ontario Act charges, Freedom Convoy participation, intimidation allegations, Magna Carta reference, Charter rights erosion claim, Bold Lie concept, vaccine contract critique, Pfizer profits discussion, no liability clauses, media fear messaging, Milgram experiment analogy, Stanford prison analogy, government overreach claim, wealth transfer allegation
Included in the Report:
Mr. Maurice Gatien
Lawyer
Both (Expert and Personal Experience)
Witness ID:
NCI-W-284
Hearing
Ottawa
Ontario
Date:
May 18, 2023
Report
Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023
Main Topic
Legal, constitutional, and ethical concerns regarding COVID-19 mandates, intimidation, vaccine procurement contracts, and suspension of Charter rights.
One Line Summary
Maurice Gatien testified that COVID-19 policies reflected intimidation, constitutional erosion, and one-sided vaccine procurement contracts lacking accountability.
Synopsis
Maurice Gatien, a lawyer called to the Ontario Bar in 1971, testified about representing individuals charged under COVID-19 emergency legislation and described being suspended by the Law Society of Ontario in September 2022. He recounted defending clients charged under the Reopening Ontario Act for participating in rallies and described what he characterized as widespread intimidation, including doxxing, harassment, and personal incidents following his public advocacy. He also described walking 110 kilometres to Ottawa during the Freedom Convoy to protest what he viewed as suppression of rights and institutional silence from legal and medical regulatory bodies.
Gatien introduced the concept of the “Bold Lie,” drawing analogies from financial fraud, advertising history, and psychological experiments such as the Milgram, conformity, and Stanford prison studies. He argued that public messaging during COVID-19 relied on fear-based narratives, asserting that the population was told both that COVID-19 posed universal lethal risk and that vaccination was the sole solution. He cited local mortality statistics from Eastern Ontario, which he reorganized by age, stating that deaths were concentrated in older populations and that under-40 mortality was negligible, and questioned the proportionality of public health responses and media framing.
He further criticized vaccine procurement contracts, describing them as one-sided agreements that included advance public funding, liability protections for manufacturers, taxpayer-funded marketing and distribution, and no profit-sharing or clawback provisions. He referenced large pharmaceutical profits and past regulatory fines as part of his concerns. Gatien concluded that Charter rights were effectively suspended during the pandemic without adequate parliamentary oversight, that dissenting professionals faced institutional pressure, and that foundational constitutional principles require vigilance to prevent future overreach.
🔎 How to Search the Transcript
Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.
Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:
-
Windows: Press Ctrl + F
-
Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F
A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.
This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.






