
Witness Testimony
Keywords from Transcript
OPP 32-year veteran, Charter supremacy argument, Adamson BBQ enforcement critique, Freedom Convoy liaison role, bank account freeze, church fine $10,000, Police for Freedom Canada, media narrative inversion claim, single perspective reporting, vaccine safety misrepresentation allegation, WEF influence concern, criminal conspiracy suspicion, Praetorian Guard analogy, failure to investigate complaints, pandemic plan abandonment
Included in the Report:
Mr. Vincent Gircys
Retired Police Officer
Both (Expert and Personal Experience)
Witness ID:
NCI-W-078
Hearing
Toronto
Ontario
Date:
April 1, 2023
Report
Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023
Main Topic
Testimony alleging police abandonment of constitutional duties, media–government narrative manipulation, and failure to investigate potential criminal conduct during pandemic response.
One Line Summary
Retired OPP officer Vincent Gircys testified that police abandoned constitutional principles during COVID enforcement, relied on a single government-media narrative, and failed to investigate potential rights violations.
Synopsis
Vincent Gircys testified that he served 32 years with the Ontario Provincial Police, including emergency response and forensic reconstruction roles, and emphasized his oath to uphold the Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He stated that during the pandemic he observed what he believed were serious constitutional violations, beginning with enforcement actions such as the large police deployment against Adamson Barbecue in Toronto. He later attended the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa as a volunteer liaison and described the atmosphere as peaceful and positive, contradicting what he characterized as misleading or false mainstream media reporting. He stated that his bank accounts were frozen following his involvement and that he faced charges and fines related to church attendance.
Gircys testified that police services failed to critically assess government directives and instead adopted what he described as a “single perspective” narrative on lockdowns, masking, vaccines, and public health measures. He argued that countervailing scientific information was available but ignored, and that officers did not adequately consider constitutional supremacy under section 52 of the Constitution Act. He further testified that no meaningful police investigations appear to have been initiated into allegations of criminal misconduct related to pandemic policies, despite complaints being filed.
He expressed concern that political influence compromised policing independence, describing a breakdown of the traditional separation between political leadership and civil service enforcement. He alleged that intelligence provided to frontline officers during the final stages of the Ottawa protest may have been inaccurate or misleading, contributing to aggressive police tactics. Gircys concluded by calling for an independent national forensic task force to investigate pandemic decision-making and warned that failure to uphold constitutional principles risks long-term erosion of public trust in policing and governance.
🔎 How to Search the Transcript
Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.
Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:
-
Windows: Press Ctrl + F
-
Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F
A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.
This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.






