top of page
Divider Lines_edited.png

Witness Testimony

Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
1 Dr. Chris Milburn TN.png
Watch the Testimony Button_edited.jpg
Read The Transcript Button_edited.png
Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Keywords from Transcript

Ingram case Alberta, Public Health Act emergency, Deena Hinshaw cross-examination, Charter rights litigation, judicial deference doctrine, union mandate grievances, involuntary unpaid leave, Pastor James Coates imprisonment, Pastor Timothy Stephens arrest, Whistle Stop injunction, judicial notice pandemic, informed consent doctrine, vaccine harms class action, politicized judicial appointments, institutional trust erosion

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Included in the Report:

Report 2.png
Download the Report Button_edited_edited_edited.png

Mr. Leighton Grey

Lawyer

Expert

Witness ID:

NCI-W-144

Hearing

Saskatoon

Saskatchewan

Date:

April 22, 2023

Report

Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Main Topic

Legal challenges to COVID-19 public health orders, judicial deference, union mandate barriers, and constitutional concerns arising from Alberta’s pandemic response.

One Line Summary

An Alberta litigation lawyer describes constitutional challenges to lockdown orders, cross-examination of the Chief Medical Officer, union barriers to mandate disputes, and concerns about judicial and institutional integrity.

Synopsis

Leighton Grey, an Alberta litigation lawyer, testified regarding his involvement in multiple COVID-19-related legal challenges, including the Ingram case contesting Alberta’s lockdown measures under the Charter and the Public Health Act. He described cross-examining Chief Medical Officer Dr. Deena Hinshaw and stated that evidence revealed Cabinet involvement in drafting public health orders issued in her name. He testified that the government initially produced no scientific evidence supporting lockdown measures and that court proceedings were subject to delays. He characterized judicial deference to executive authority and reliance on judicial notice as significant features of pandemic litigation.
Grey also described representing pastors James Coates and Timothy Stephens, who were jailed for violating public health restrictions related to worship services. He stated that Pastor Coates was detained for 35 days after refusing bail conditions restricting his preaching, and that Pastor Stephens was arrested and jailed in relation to an injunction governing public gatherings. He further testified that procedural irregularities occurred in Stephens’ arrest and that charges were ultimately dismissed.
In addition, Grey testified about representing unionized employees placed on unpaid leave for refusing vaccination mandates, stating that collective bargaining structures and union decisions limited access to judicial remedies. He discussed informed consent principles in relation to vaccination and indicated that vaccine injury litigation is developing, including potential class actions. Grey expressed concern about politicization in judicial appointments, the functioning of administrative tribunals, and erosion of public confidence in legal, medical, and governmental institutions during the pandemic.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

 

🔎  How to Search the Transcript

 

Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.

Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:

  • Windows: Press Ctrl + F

  • Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F

 

A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.

This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.

Divider Lines_edited.png

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Disclaimer: The National Citizens Archive is an independent archival and research initiative created to preserve, organize, and make accessible historical materials, testimony, transcripts, reports, and related public records arising from the National Citizens Inquiry process. The National Citizens Archive is not the official website of the federally incorporated National Citizens Inquiry organization, and no formal legal, corporate, or governance relationship should be inferred unless and until such a relationship is expressly agreed to in writing by the relevant parties.

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page