top of page
Divider Lines_edited.png

Witness Testimony

Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
1 Dr. Chris Milburn TN.png
Watch the Testimony Button_edited.jpg
Read The Transcript Button_edited.png
Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Keywords from Transcript

journalist ticketed protest, Victoria Park rally, $2,800 fine, selective enforcement claim, Black Lives Matter comparison, contact tracing opposition, restaurant data collection, YouTube content removal, vaccine injury reporting, editorial rejection, under-12 vaccination opposition, transplant mandate controversy, article retraction, federal media subsidies, Local Journalism Initiative

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Included in the Report:

Report 2.png
Download the Report Button_edited_edited_edited.png

Mr. Lee Harding

Journalist

Both (Expert and Personal Experience)

Witness ID:

NCI-W-143

Hearing

Saskatoon

Saskatchewan

Date:

April 21, 2023

Report

Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Main Topic

Media censorship, selective enforcement of public health rules, and institutional pressures affecting COVID-19 reporting in Canada.

One Line Summary

A Saskatchewan journalist describes being ticketed while covering protests and recounts editorial resistance and content removal when reporting on vaccine safety and mandate-related stories.

Synopsis

Lee Harding, a Saskatchewan journalist and policy researcher, testified that he was issued a $2,800 ticket while covering a freedom rally in Regina, despite identifying himself as a journalist. He described what he characterized as inconsistent enforcement of public health gathering limits, contrasting enforcement at freedom rallies with perceived tolerance of Black Lives Matter protests. He also objected to provincial restaurant contact tracing requirements, describing them as excessive and symbolic rather than evidence-based.
Harding testified that during the early vaccine rollout he attempted to publish articles raising concerns about the speed of vaccine development and the use of mRNA technology. He stated that submissions were rejected or discouraged by editorial outlets citing source credibility concerns, brand risk, or inability to vet medical claims. He described having YouTube content removed after reading public accounts of alleged vaccine adverse reactions and reported that articles about pediatric vaccination risks and transplant-related vaccination requirements were rejected or removed after publication.
He further testified that media organizations operate under financial and reputational pressures, including federal subsidy programs such as the $600 million tax relief package and the Local Journalism Initiative. Harding stated that some publications declined government funding to preserve independence, while others rely heavily on government and institutional advertising. He concluded that journalists faced structural incentives that shaped editorial decisions during the pandemic, affecting which viewpoints were amplified or suppressed.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

 

🔎  How to Search the Transcript

 

Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.

​

Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:

​

  • Windows: Press Ctrl + F

  • Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F

 

A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.

​

This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.

Divider Lines_edited.png

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Disclaimer: The National Citizens Archive is an independent archival and research initiative created to preserve, organize, and make accessible historical materials, testimony, transcripts, reports, and related public records arising from the National Citizens Inquiry process. The National Citizens Archive is not the official website of the federally incorporated National Citizens Inquiry organization, and no formal legal, corporate, or governance relationship should be inferred unless and until such a relationship is expressly agreed to in writing by the relevant parties.

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page