top of page
Divider Lines_edited.png

Witness Testimony

Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
1 Dr. Chris Milburn TN.png
Watch the Testimony Button_edited.jpg
Read The Transcript Button_edited.png
Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Keywords from Transcript

rural BC physician, Lytton emergency doctor, gene-based vaccine critique, D-dimer testing findings, microvascular clotting hypothesis, neurological injury reports, vaccine injury reporting denial, CAEFISS system criticism, CAERS reporting distinction, natural immunity argument, emergency room termination, College discipline proceedings, spike protein biodistribution claim, fertility concerns raised, excess hospitalization analysis

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Included in the Report:

Report 2.png
Download the Report Button_edited_edited_edited.png

Dr. Charles Hoffe MD

Physician

Both (Expert and Personal Experience)

Witness ID:

NCI-W-207

Hearing

Vancouver

British Columbia

Date:

May 3, 2023

Report

Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Main Topic

Clinical observations of neurological injury and microvascular clotting following COVID-19 vaccination, professional discipline, and critique of vaccine safety oversight.

One Line Summary

Rural BC physician testifies to observed post-vaccine neurological symptoms, positive D-dimer findings, professional sanctions, and concerns about regulatory oversight.

Synopsis

Dr. Charles Hoffe, a family physician and long-serving rural emergency room doctor in Lytton, British Columbia, testified regarding his clinical observations following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. He described early concerns about gene-based vaccine platforms and stated that he began observing neurological symptoms, chronic pain, weakness, and other health issues in patients shortly after vaccination. He reported conducting D-dimer blood tests on a small group of patients, stating that a portion showed elevated levels consistent with clotting activity, which he interpreted as possible microvascular injury.
He testified that after communicating safety concerns to colleagues and public health officials, he was warned not to express negative views about the vaccines in his professional capacity and was later removed from emergency room duties after advising a previously infected patient that a second dose was unnecessary due to natural immunity. He stated that vaccine injury reports he submitted through the government reporting system were denied and characterized the national surveillance system as inadequate. He distinguished between the governmental CAEFISS reporting system and the non-governmental CAERS reporting initiative.
Dr. Hoffe further presented data and international comparisons which, in his view, demonstrated increased infection and hospitalization rates among vaccinated populations and raised concerns regarding immune system effects and fertility trends. He described an upcoming disciplinary hearing before the College of Physicians and Surgeons and asserted that regulatory bodies were dismissing safety signals. He concluded that professional pressure discouraged open scientific debate and that the pandemic response constituted a broader ethical test for institutions and individuals.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

 

🔎  How to Search the Transcript

 

Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.

​

Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:

​

  • Windows: Press Ctrl + F

  • Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F

 

A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.

​

This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.

Divider Lines_edited.png

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Disclaimer: The National Citizens Archive is an independent archival and research initiative created to preserve, organize, and make accessible historical materials, testimony, transcripts, reports, and related public records arising from the National Citizens Inquiry process. The National Citizens Archive is not the official website of the federally incorporated National Citizens Inquiry organization, and no formal legal, corporate, or governance relationship should be inferred unless and until such a relationship is expressly agreed to in writing by the relevant parties.

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page