
Witness Testimony
Keywords from Transcript
mandatory vaccination policy, remote work arrangement, refusal without exemption, termination notice, reference letter positive, misconduct classification EI, Employment Insurance denial, Service Canada appeal, constitutional rights argument, Civil Code consent, Federal Court challenge, CNESST complaint, Tribunal administratif du travail, return to office policy, no testing alternative
Included in the Report:
Mr. Gary Lalancette
Information Technology Analyst
Personal Experience
Witness ID:
NCI-W-252
Hearing
Québec City
Québec
Date:
May 13, 2025
Report
Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023
Main Topic
Termination of employment for refusal to comply with a workplace COVID-19 vaccination policy and subsequent denial of Employment Insurance benefits on grounds of misconduct.
One Line Summary
An IT analyst describes being dismissed for refusing vaccination, denied Employment Insurance for alleged misconduct, and pursuing appeals before federal and provincial tribunals.
Synopsis
Gary Lalancette, an information technology analyst with approximately 30 years of experience, testified that he had been working remotely full-time since the March 2020 health emergency without disruption to his duties. In August 2021, his employer implemented a mandatory vaccination policy requiring proof of full vaccination as a condition of continued employment and return to the office. He declined vaccination without invoking medical or religious exemptions, citing concerns about consent and bodily integrity. Despite receiving a positive reference letter confirming his professional performance, his employment was terminated on September 30, 2021 for non-compliance with the policy.
Following his dismissal, Lalancette applied for Employment Insurance benefits. Service Canada denied his claim on the basis of misconduct, stating that his refusal to comply with company policy rendered him responsible for his termination. He appealed the decision administratively, arguing that he had exercised fundamental rights under the Civil Code concerning free and informed consent to medical treatment. He testified that the review authority maintained the misconduct finding and indicated it did not have jurisdiction to rule on constitutional arguments.
Lalancette subsequently initiated proceedings in Federal Court to contest the Employment Insurance decision and filed a separate complaint with the CNESST alleging dismissal without just cause. He described ongoing legal proceedings, including appeals and a scheduled hearing before the Tribunal administratif du travail. At the time of his testimony, he was awaiting further hearing dates while continuing to challenge both the classification of misconduct and the lawfulness of his dismissal.
🔎 How to Search the Transcript
Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.
Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:
-
Windows: Press Ctrl + F
-
Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F
A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.
This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.






