top of page
Divider Lines_edited.png

Witness Testimony

Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
1 Dr. Chris Milburn TN.png
Watch the Testimony Button_edited.jpg
Read The Transcript Button_edited.png
Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Keywords from Transcript

mandatory vaccination policy, remote work arrangement, refusal without exemption, termination notice, reference letter positive, misconduct classification EI, Employment Insurance denial, Service Canada appeal, constitutional rights argument, Civil Code consent, Federal Court challenge, CNESST complaint, Tribunal administratif du travail, return to office policy, no testing alternative

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Included in the Report:

Report 2.png
Download the Report Button_edited_edited_edited.png

Mr. Gary Lalancette

Information Technology Analyst

Personal Experience

Witness ID:

NCI-W-252

Hearing

Québec City

Québec

Date:

May 13, 2025

Report

Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Main Topic

Termination of employment for refusal to comply with a workplace COVID-19 vaccination policy and subsequent denial of Employment Insurance benefits on grounds of misconduct.

One Line Summary

An IT analyst describes being dismissed for refusing vaccination, denied Employment Insurance for alleged misconduct, and pursuing appeals before federal and provincial tribunals.

Synopsis

Gary Lalancette, an information technology analyst with approximately 30 years of experience, testified that he had been working remotely full-time since the March 2020 health emergency without disruption to his duties. In August 2021, his employer implemented a mandatory vaccination policy requiring proof of full vaccination as a condition of continued employment and return to the office. He declined vaccination without invoking medical or religious exemptions, citing concerns about consent and bodily integrity. Despite receiving a positive reference letter confirming his professional performance, his employment was terminated on September 30, 2021 for non-compliance with the policy.
Following his dismissal, Lalancette applied for Employment Insurance benefits. Service Canada denied his claim on the basis of misconduct, stating that his refusal to comply with company policy rendered him responsible for his termination. He appealed the decision administratively, arguing that he had exercised fundamental rights under the Civil Code concerning free and informed consent to medical treatment. He testified that the review authority maintained the misconduct finding and indicated it did not have jurisdiction to rule on constitutional arguments.
Lalancette subsequently initiated proceedings in Federal Court to contest the Employment Insurance decision and filed a separate complaint with the CNESST alleging dismissal without just cause. He described ongoing legal proceedings, including appeals and a scheduled hearing before the Tribunal administratif du travail. At the time of his testimony, he was awaiting further hearing dates while continuing to challenge both the classification of misconduct and the lawfulness of his dismissal.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

 

🔎  How to Search the Transcript

 

Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.

Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:

  • Windows: Press Ctrl + F

  • Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F

 

A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.

This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.

Divider Lines_edited.png

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Disclaimer: The National Citizens Archive is an independent archival and research initiative created to preserve, organize, and make accessible historical materials, testimony, transcripts, reports, and related public records arising from the National Citizens Inquiry process. The National Citizens Archive is not the official website of the federally incorporated National Citizens Inquiry organization, and no formal legal, corporate, or governance relationship should be inferred unless and until such a relationship is expressly agreed to in writing by the relevant parties.

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page