top of page
Divider Lines_edited.png

Witness Testimony

Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
1 Dr. Chris Milburn TN.png
Watch the Testimony Button_edited.jpg
Read The Transcript Button_edited.png
Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Keywords from Transcript

public policy analysis, lockdown critique, emergency management plans, institutional failure, rule of law, judicial deference, media funding concerns, freedom of speech, classical liberalism, Sweden comparison, Great Barrington Declaration, middle class erosion, corporate-state relationship, healthcare system performance, Bill C-11 concerns

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Included in the Report:

Report 2.png
Download the Report Button_edited.jpg

Mr. David Leis

Public Policy Executive

Expert

Witness ID:

NCI-W-115

Hearing

Winnipeg

Manitoba

Date:

April 15, 2023

Report

Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Main Topic

Critique of Canadian COVID-19 public policy decision-making, institutional performance, and impacts on civil liberties and democratic governance.

One Line Summary

A public policy expert argues that Canada’s COVID-19 response represented a failure of governance, emergency planning, institutional independence, and protection of civil liberties.

Synopsis

David Leis, a public policy executive and former municipal mayor, testified that Canada’s COVID-19 response constituted a significant public policy failure. Drawing on his background in emergency management and public administration, he stated that established emergency plans were not followed and that mortality data early in the pandemic did not justify broad societal lockdowns. He characterized the response as inconsistent with principles of sound policy analysis and argued that political leaders deferred excessively to public health authorities rather than conducting integrated, cross-sector decision-making.
Leis further testified that multiple institutions—including media, courts, healthcare systems, educational bodies, and professional regulators—failed to provide adequate oversight or open debate. He expressed concern about government funding of media organizations, limitations on public debate, and what he described as diminished judicial independence. He emphasized the foundational importance of freedom of expression, open intellectual debate, and adherence to common law traditions in sustaining liberal democracy.
He also discussed broader structural concerns, including the relationship between large corporations and government, the impact of lockdowns on small businesses and the middle class, and the concentration of institutional power. Referencing Sweden as a comparative case, he stated that adherence to established emergency frameworks and less restrictive policies produced more favorable outcomes. He concluded by encouraging greater civic engagement, local political participation, and public vigilance to safeguard democratic governance and civil liberties.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

 

🔎  How to Search the Transcript

 

Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.

Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:

  • Windows: Press Ctrl + F

  • Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F

 

A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.

This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.

Divider Lines_edited.png

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page