
Witness Testimony

Keywords from Transcript
public policy analysis, lockdown critique, emergency management plans, institutional failure, rule of law, judicial deference, media funding concerns, freedom of speech, classical liberalism, Sweden comparison, Great Barrington Declaration, middle class erosion, corporate-state relationship, healthcare system performance, Bill C-11 concerns
Included in the Report:
Mr. David Leis
Public Policy Executive
Expert
Witness ID:
NCI-W-115
Hearing
Winnipeg
Manitoba
Date:
April 15, 2023
Report
Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023
Main Topic
Critique of Canadian COVID-19 public policy decision-making, institutional performance, and impacts on civil liberties and democratic governance.
One Line Summary
A public policy expert argues that Canada’s COVID-19 response represented a failure of governance, emergency planning, institutional independence, and protection of civil liberties.
Synopsis
David Leis, a public policy executive and former municipal mayor, testified that Canada’s COVID-19 response constituted a significant public policy failure. Drawing on his background in emergency management and public administration, he stated that established emergency plans were not followed and that mortality data early in the pandemic did not justify broad societal lockdowns. He characterized the response as inconsistent with principles of sound policy analysis and argued that political leaders deferred excessively to public health authorities rather than conducting integrated, cross-sector decision-making.
Leis further testified that multiple institutions—including media, courts, healthcare systems, educational bodies, and professional regulators—failed to provide adequate oversight or open debate. He expressed concern about government funding of media organizations, limitations on public debate, and what he described as diminished judicial independence. He emphasized the foundational importance of freedom of expression, open intellectual debate, and adherence to common law traditions in sustaining liberal democracy.
He also discussed broader structural concerns, including the relationship between large corporations and government, the impact of lockdowns on small businesses and the middle class, and the concentration of institutional power. Referencing Sweden as a comparative case, he stated that adherence to established emergency frameworks and less restrictive policies produced more favorable outcomes. He concluded by encouraging greater civic engagement, local political participation, and public vigilance to safeguard democratic governance and civil liberties.
🔎 How to Search the Transcript
Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.
Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:
-
Windows: Press Ctrl + F
-
Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F
A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.
This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.





