top of page
Divider Lines_edited.png

Witness Testimony

Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
Previous and Next Witness Testimony_edited.png
1 Dr. Chris Milburn TN.png
Watch the Testimony Button_edited.jpg
Read The Transcript Button_edited.png
Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Keywords from Transcript

informed consent principles, voluntary consent requirement, coercion allegation, mRNA vaccine novelty, long-term safety data absence, vaccine financial incentive, Alberta Blue Cross billing, pharmacy competition, cold-calling patients, government encouragement claim, mask exemption termination, Human Rights complaint delay, pharmacy regulatory pressure, youth consent concerns, drug industry influence

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Included in the Report:

Report 2.png
Download the Report Button_edited_edited_edited.png

Ms. Ann McCormack

Pharmacist

Both (Expert and Personal Experience)

Witness ID:

NCI-W-122

Hearing

Saskatoon

Saskatchewan

Date:

April 20, 2023

Report

Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023

Horizontal Golden Divider Line_edited.png

Main Topic

Pharmacy vaccine rollout practices, informed consent concerns, financial incentives, and employment termination related to mask mandates.

One Line Summary

A former Alberta pharmacist raises concerns about informed consent, vaccine billing incentives, patient outreach practices, and her job loss following a mask exemption dispute.

Synopsis

Ann McCormack, a former licensed pharmacist with a Bachelor of Pharmacy degree, testified regarding pharmacy practices during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in rural Alberta. She described differences in vaccine distribution between pharmacies, including competition for vaccine supply and an increased billing fee of $25 per COVID-19 dose compared to approximately $13 for traditional vaccines. She stated that pharmacies did not purchase the vaccines directly but billed the province for administration. She also testified that pharmacists were encouraged to consult patient databases and contact individuals to book vaccination appointments.
McCormack emphasized informed consent as a foundational principle of healthcare, stating that consent must be voluntary, informed, and based on capacity to understand risks and benefits. She characterized employment mandates such as “no jab, no job” as coercive and inconsistent with voluntary consent. She further testified that when questions arose about long-term safety data or risks such as blood clots, responses from some pharmacists minimized uncertainty, and she expressed concern that professional opinions were sometimes inserted into patient discussions rather than strictly factual information.
She stated that she was not licensed at the time and did not administer vaccines, but indicated she would have resigned if required to inject a product about which she had concerns. McCormack also testified that she lost her pharmacy assistant position after declining to wear a mask despite having a medical exemption, following a public complaint. She filed a complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission and stated that proceedings have been delayed for nearly two years, raising concerns about access to legal recourse.

Divider Lines_edited_edited.png

 

🔎  How to Search the Transcript

 

Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.

Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:

  • Windows: Press Ctrl + F

  • Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F

 

A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.

This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.

Divider Lines_edited.png

National Citizens Archive
Witness Testimony | Commissioner Reports | Research Archive

© National Citizens Archive

Disclaimer: The National Citizens Archive is an independent archival and research initiative created to preserve, organize, and make accessible historical materials, testimony, transcripts, reports, and related public records arising from the National Citizens Inquiry process. The National Citizens Archive is not the official website of the federally incorporated National Citizens Inquiry organization, and no formal legal, corporate, or governance relationship should be inferred unless and until such a relationship is expressly agreed to in writing by the relevant parties.

Divider Lines_edited.png
bottom of page