
Witness Testimony
Keywords from Transcript
RNA microRNA research, lipid nanoparticle expertise, CT cycle threshold critique, Pfizer adverse effects personal, pediatric vaccination opposition, Réinfo Covid conference, university suspension without pay, Bill 32 academic freedom, media censorship allegation, IJVTPR publications, pharmacovigilance six-week window, adverse event underreporting claim, spike protein biodistribution concern, vaccine vial analysis proposal, whistleblower status claim
Included in the Report:
Dr. Patrick Provost PhD
Molecular Biologist
Both (Expert and Personal Experience)
Witness ID:
NCI-W-260
Hearing
Québec City
Québec
Date:
May 13, 2025
Report
Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023
Main Topic
Scientific critique of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, allegations of underreported adverse events, institutional censorship, and claimed violations of academic freedom following public dissent.
One Line Summary
A Université Laval professor describes vaccine side effects, opposition to child vaccination, suspensions for public statements, and argues that mRNA vaccine risks are underestimated and academic freedom is threatened.
Synopsis
Dr. Patrick Provost, a full professor and RNA researcher at Université Laval, testified regarding his scientific background, personal experience following a Pfizer COVID-19 injection, and subsequent public opposition to pediatric vaccination. He reported experiencing five unusual side effects after his first dose and stated that his physician declined to formally report them. He described speaking publicly at a December 7, 2021 conference to question the risk-benefit balance of vaccinating children aged 5–11, which he identified as the turning point leading to complaints and disciplinary proceedings by his university.
Provost outlined two unpaid suspensions and an ongoing arbitration process related to allegations of biased interpretation, lack of rigour, and dissemination of polarizing information. He argued that these sanctions violate Quebec’s Bill 32 on academic freedom and reflect institutional censorship influenced by political and private interests. He described media coverage as defamatory and asserted that debate on COVID-19 policies has been suppressed in mainstream outlets. He also detailed the discontinuation of a university opinion column and described broader concerns about self-censorship among academics.
Scientifically, he presented three publications in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. He argued that mRNA vaccines function as pro-drugs with unpredictable biodistribution and spike protein expression levels, raising myocarditis concerns. He reported findings from retrospective pharmacy record analysis suggesting that adverse events occurring beyond a six-week surveillance window may be undercounted, and he asserted that overall vaccine-related adverse events may be substantially underestimated. He called for independent laboratory analysis of vaccine vial contents, public scientific debate, and strengthened protections for academic freedom.
🔎 How to Search the Transcript
Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.
Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:
-
Windows: Press Ctrl + F
-
Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F
A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.
This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.






