
Witness Testimony
Keywords from Transcript
social medicine philosophy, triple vaccinated physician, fourth dose refusal, daughter unvaccinated impact, Collège des médecins moratorium request, precautionary principle, pregnant women vaccination, children vaccination concerns, menstrual disorder reports, shingles post vaccine, blood clot cases, immunosuppressed vaccination conflict, media distrust claim, vaccine passport exclusion, blame versus learning model
Included in the Report:
Dr. Jean Saint-Arnaud MD
Family Physician
Both (Expert and Personal Experience)
Witness ID:
NCI-W-259
Hearing
Québec City
Québec
Date:
May 13, 2025
Report
Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada; November 2023
Main Topic
Ethical concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination of pregnant women and children, institutional deference to public health authorities, observed adverse events in his community, and call for scientific debate and reconciliation.
One Line Summary
A retired Quebec family physician explains his shift in perspective on COVID-19 vaccination, calls for a precautionary pause for pregnant women and children, and advocates scientific debate over institutional deference.
Synopsis
Dr. Jean St-Arnaud, a retired family physician with an obstetrics background and long-standing commitment to social medicine, testified about his professional journey and evolving views during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially accepting what he described as the prevailing scientific consensus, he received three vaccine doses and later contracted a mild Omicron infection. His perspective shifted following discussions with his unvaccinated daughter and participation in a demonstration organized by physicians and scientists calling for a moratorium on vaccinating pregnant women and children under the precautionary principle. He co-signed a letter to the Collège des médecins requesting reconsideration of these policies and later testified before the College, which responded by deferring to Public Health authorities rather than engaging in scientific debate.
Drawing on his experience reforming childbirth practices in the 1970s—where he helped move from a uniform surgical model to individualized birthing rooms—he argued that medical consensus can evolve and should remain open to questioning. He reported hearing from individuals within his community about menstrual disorders, shingles, blood clot events, and conflicting medical advice for immunosuppressed patients following vaccination. Although he personally experienced no adverse reactions, he stated that these reports raised concerns about fertility implications and the adequacy of safety data, particularly for vulnerable populations.
He also described personal impacts of vaccine passport policies, including accompanying his grandson to events because his unvaccinated daughter was excluded. He expressed disappointment in mainstream media coverage and institutional silence, stating that public discourse had become polarized and punitive. Concluding his testimony, he called for a ceasefire in public debate, advocating a transition from a “blame approach” to a “learning approach” grounded in humility, open scientific discussion, and restoration of social cohesion.
🔎 How to Search the Transcript
Click the “Read Transcript” button to open the witness testimony in your browser.
Once the transcript PDF is open, you can search for any word or phrase within the document using your browser’s search feature:
-
Windows: Press Ctrl + F
-
Mac: Press Command (⌘) + F
A small search box will appear. Type the word or phrase you are looking for, and the browser will highlight every occurrence within the transcript.
This makes it easy to quickly locate specific topics, names, or statements within the testimony.






